I have posted the trailer
for the movie once more because I decided to actually watch the movie. The
movie stars Kathy Bates, Mary Stuart Masterson, Mary-Louise Parker, and Jessica
Tandy. The movie overall did a good job of expressing the main themes and plot
of the story. It got out the message that Fannie Flagg had intended when she
wrote the story. It was well casted and they did a great job.
There were many,
many differences though that I found to be interesting. First of all, the way
the book is written makes it hard to convert into a movie. It has a bunch of
little episodes of story from all different time periods that you have to
connect to each other to understand the story. Obviously that would have been a
very confusing movie. They ended up putting most of it in chronological order.
One of the major
differences was that they left out alot of the black slaves stories and even
some of the characters. I think that they did this because they wanted to make
the story revolve mostly around Ruth and Idgie and going into detail about
other smaller characters would have taken away from the main plot line. By
doing so, they had to change the way that Buddy died and introduced Ruth much
earlier into the movie. Ruth comes into Idgie’s life when she is a teenager and
in the movie Ruth knows Idgie when she was just a little kid. For the movie
they needed to be able to build up the relationship between Ruth and Idgie
quickly and if they had waited to bring her into the plot it would have taken
too long to fully grasp their relationship.
Also there are many
times in the book when Mrs.Threadgoode is telling the story and does not know
the full details of what had happened which made the book much more mysterious.
For example, when Idgie went on trial for killing Frank Bennett, the reader did
not find out who actually killed him until way after the trial. The reader got
a chance to guess who killed Mr.Bennet. In the movie, everything is
chronological so you get to see that Sipsey killed Frank leaving no mystery.
Since it was a movie, the only way to show that Frank had been murdered was to
show the scene before the trial or else it could have been confusing.
In the book during
the trial, Ruth had already died so she was unable to testify for Idgie. In the
movie Ruth was alive. I found this to be peculiar because it doesn’t make sense
that Ruth was able to testify for Idgie and Idgie still be in trouble. Ruth was
her alibi in the movie which helped her get out of the trouble but in the book
that is the reason the trail gets even worse for Idgie.
Now to discuss Evelyn.
In the movie Evelyn attends all of these classes to help her marriage which she
doesn’t do in the book. I think she does this to emphasize how bad her marriage
really is. Also it is hard to understand how depressed Evelyn really is in the
movie. In the book she explains how she is practically suicidal. The movie does
not do the best job of explaining this.
One of the biggest
differences between the book and the movie is that Mrs. Threadgoode never dies
and they imply that Mrs. Threadgoode is Idgie. They never go into Mrs.Threadgoode’s
life or ever show her in any of the flashback. In the book they are clearly two
separate people. I can’t quite figure out why they would do this. In the book
there are so many different characters each with their own stories and
backgrounds. The screenwriter might have thought it would be easier to cut her out
and just make Mrs. Threadgoode be Idgie. Evelyn looks up to both
characters, Idgie and Mrs. Threadgood. By making them the same person it ties the story together a
little better and more simply.